FDA
27th November 2017

FDA Advisory Committee Votes Negatively on Safety and Effectiveness of Bayer’s Ciprofloxacin Inhalation Powder

The FDA’s Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) convened on November 16th to discuss ciprofloxacin inhalation powder (NDA 209367).

FDA Advisory Committee Votes Negatively on Safety and Effectiveness of Bayer’s Ciprofloxacin Inhalation Powder

The FDA’s Antimicrobial Drugs Advisory Committee (AMDAC) convened on November 16th to discuss ciprofloxacin inhalation powder (NDA 209367), sponsored by Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Inc., for the proposed indication of reduction of exacerbations in non-cystic fibrosis (CF) bronchiectasis (NCFB) in adult patients (≥18 years of age) with respiratory bacterial pathogen.

Ciprofloxacin is a synthetic, fluorinated carboxyquinolone and has in vitro activity against both Gram-negative and Gram-positive organisms. The bactericidal action of ciprofloxacin results from inhibition of bacterial type II topoisomerases (DNA gyrase) and topoisomerase IV, which are required for bacterial DNA replication, transcription, repair, and recombination.

The committee was asked whether the applicant provided substantial evidence of the safety and effectiveness for the ciprofloxacin dry powder inhaler (DPI) 14 and 28- day regimens in delaying the time to first exacerbation after starting treatment. At the end of the meeting, the committee voted Yes: 6 / No: 9 and Yes: 1 / No: 14 to the questions as to whether the sponsor provided substantial evidence of the safety or effectiveness of 14- and 28-day ciprofloxacin regimens, respectively, in delaying the time to first pulmonary exacerbation after starting treatment.

The committee’s negative vote came after review of data from the Phase III RESPIRE 1 and RESPIRE 2 trials with a total of 937 patients with non-CF bronchiectasis. In RESPIRE 1, the 14-day on/off regimen of ciprofloxacin met the primary endpoint of improving median time to first pulmonary exacerbation vs. pooled placebo (>336 vs. 186 days, p=0.0005), but the 28-day on/off regimen did not. In RESPIRE 2, both the 14- and 28-day on/off regimens of ciprofloxacin missed the primary endpoint of improving median time to first pulmonary exacerbation vs. pooled placebo.

FDA advisory committees are panels of independent experts who advise the FDA on specific questions raised by the FDA as they consider regulatory decisions. Although not bound by the recommendation of the committee, the Agency usually follows its guidance during the final review process. Ciprofloxacin inhalation powder is a qualified infections disease product and has been granted orphan drug status, fast track status, and breakthrough therapy designation for the treatment of NCFB.

ISS has almost two decades of experience in developing regulatory strategies including support for FDA Advisory Committee meetings. We are involved in more FDA AdComms per year than even the largest pharmaceutical companies. For more information on how ISS can help you prepare for your next meeting, contact info@innovativescience.net

Do you have an upcoming Advisory Committee Meeting?

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Related Articles

Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission
01 July 2020
Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission

Over the past few years, the number of ex-US manufacturers submitting a Class II exempt 510k device registration has increased substantially. For companies with medical devices that are approved and successful in a foreign market, the logical next step is to introduce their product into the US, which has one of the most lucrative healthcare markets in the world. Read more

Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices
25 June 2020
Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices

FDA advisory committee meetings are important regulatory events for many manufacturers on the path to marketing approval. These meetings can quite literally result in the approval or rejection of a product based on the panel’s vote. Read more

NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?
22 June 2020
NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?

One of the main challenges our clients face is determining which regulatory pathway is best for their products. For example, what if an OTC product has a Monograph active ingredient but that ingredient is present at a different amount than the permitted amount? Or what if the label claims a novel indication not specified in a Monograph? If you are debating pursuit of either regulatory pathway for your OTC drug, it is critical to consider cost, timeline, and label claims to ensure your products has a unique stance in today’s market. Read more

4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus
19 June 2020
4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus

US distributors and agents trying to import rapid antibody tests for coronavirus face a number of obstacles. The good news is that FDA has opened up the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program to include SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) and COVID-19 (the disease), expediting time to market. Read more

Let’s work together

The journey to scientific and commercial success is often complex and always critical, if you are looking for an expert partner to help steer you to confident solutions, contact us today

Contact us