FDA
14th June 2019

FDA Endocrinology and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Split on Approvability of Sotagliflozin Oral Tablet for Diabetes

On January 17th, 2019, the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) reviewed.

FDA Endocrinology and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee Split on Approvability of Sotagliflozin Oral Tablet for Diabetes

On January 17th, 2019, the Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) reviewed the New Drug Application (NDA) 210934 sotagliflozin (Sanofi-Aventis U.S., LLC.) which seeks approval of sotagliflozin as an adjunct to insulin therapy to improve glycemic control in adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Sotagliflozin is a dual inhibitor of sodium-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1) and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2). It lowers plasma glucose by increasing urinary glucose excretion and purports to alter improved glycemic control by lowering hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), reduced hypoglycemia and reduced body weight based on results of three phase 3 clinical trials.

In this meeting, there were 4 discussion questions and 1 voting question. The main voting question on whether benefits outweigh the risk and support for approval resulted in a tie (8 YES to 8 NO).

The committee members in support of the product noted that the drug can be beneficial if the patient understands the risks and follows strict monitoring methods. Most felt that the applicant’s post meeting plan could further define risks in the larger population. Those who voted no, expressed that the company failed to show data supporting ketone monitoring and risk mitigation strategies. They emphasized their concern about the observed risk of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in the phase 3 studies. Specifically, they worry that DKA risk will be higher in the real world.

The agency is not obligated to follow its panel’s recommendation, but normally does so.

On March 22nd, the FDA issued a Complete Response Letter (CRL). The letter informed Sanofi-Aventis that the current application cannot be approved in its present form. As of now, the company is currently working with the FDA to determine the next appropriate steps.

ISS has almost two decades of experience in developing regulatory strategies including support for FDA Advisory Committee meetings. We are involved in more FDA AdComms per year than even the largest pharmaceutical companies. For more information on how ISS can help you prepare for your next meeting, contact info@innovativescience.net

This blog post was authored by Sharon Christian. Sharon is a summer intern at ISS and an undergraduate student at Rutgers University.

Recent Related Articles

Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission
01 July 2020
Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission

Over the past few years, the number of ex-US manufacturers submitting a Class II exempt 510k device registration has increased substantially. For companies with medical devices that are approved and successful in a foreign market, the logical next step is to introduce their product into the US, which has one of the most lucrative healthcare markets in the world. Read more

Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices
25 June 2020
Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices

FDA advisory committee meetings are important regulatory events for many manufacturers on the path to marketing approval. These meetings can quite literally result in the approval or rejection of a product based on the panel’s vote. Read more

NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?
22 June 2020
NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?

One of the main challenges our clients face is determining which regulatory pathway is best for their products. For example, what if an OTC product has a Monograph active ingredient but that ingredient is present at a different amount than the permitted amount? Or what if the label claims a novel indication not specified in a Monograph? If you are debating pursuit of either regulatory pathway for your OTC drug, it is critical to consider cost, timeline, and label claims to ensure your products has a unique stance in today’s market. Read more

4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus
19 June 2020
4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus

US distributors and agents trying to import rapid antibody tests for coronavirus face a number of obstacles. The good news is that FDA has opened up the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program to include SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) and COVID-19 (the disease), expediting time to market. Read more

Let’s work together

The journey to scientific and commercial success is often complex and always critical, if you are looking for an expert partner to help steer you to confident solutions, contact us today

Contact us