FDA
11th June 2020

OTC Monograph User Fees are Cancelled for FY2020

Surprising news emerged from the FDA early this week – OTC Monograph User Fee program (OMUFA) facility fees for fiscal year 2020 have been dropped.

OTC Monograph User Fees are Cancelled for FY2020

Surprising news emerged from the FDA early this week – OTC Monograph User Fee program (OMUFA) facility fees for fiscal year 2020 have been dropped.

As discussed in a prior blog post, the annual OMUFA facility fee – established by Section 744M(a) of the Over-the-Counter Monograph Safety, Innovation, and Reform Act of 2019 – applies to qualifying persons who own an OTC Monograph drug facility, including contract manufacturing organization (CMO) facilities. While manufacturers will pay the full OMUFA facility fee amount, CMOs are only required to pay two-thirds of the fee.

Initially, OMUFA facility fees were expected to be published in mid-May 2020, with a payment deadline within 45 days of publication. However, when taking a closer look at Section 744M(f), fees may only be collected after the posting of the appropriations act. The appropriations act, which will specify the total amount of fees to be collected each fiscal year, shall be available starting October 2020 for the next fiscal year.

Following the publication of the appropriations act, FDA plans to publish the exact facility fee amounts in a Federal Register Notice (FRN). OTC Monograph drug facility fees for fiscal year 2021 will be due 45 days after publication of this FRN. Therefore, instead of 2020 fees being due in late June or early July 2020, they will now be dropped and 2021 fees will be due no earlier than mid-November 2020. Importantly, facilities that fail to pay the OMUFA fee within 20 calendar days of the due date will be deemed misbranded.

The sudden turnaround in FDA’s Monograph Drug Review is a prime example of the ever-changing regulatory landscape. We have handled similar cases in the past, such as the Biosimilars Review and Approval process, where the timeline for meetings between sponsors and agency stretched from 75 days within request to 90 days. Despite the change, FDA is still not meeting that performance goal. Such circumstances present risks to industry’s goals, if overlooked, and highlight the need to collaborate with experts who are adept in this complex environment.

FDA’s move towards a modernized Monograph Drug Review process creates new opportunities for manufacturers and marketers of OTC drug products. To effectively navigate the complex regulatory arena and stay ahead of fee deadlines, OTC marketers and their counsel must maintain an awareness of the science and regulatory landscapes.

ISS has decades of experience in handling regulatory interactions with the FDA on behalf of clients. Our scientific and regulatory experts are highly skilled at OTC product formulation, CMC and quality review, labeling, preparing for FDA meetings, and other regulatory interactions. Let ISS assist you in navigating the complex regulatory arena of OTC Monograph Review now!

Subscribe today and stay tuned for the latest Monograph Reform Developments from ISS. For custom advice on how ISS can help you, contact info@innovativescience.net

SUBSCRIBE NOW!

  • Hidden
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Recent Related Articles

Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission
01 July 2020
Best Tips for Medical Device Manufacturers to Write a Compelling Substantial Equivalence Section for their FDA 510k Submission

Over the past few years, the number of ex-US manufacturers submitting a Class II exempt 510k device registration has increased substantially. For companies with medical devices that are approved and successful in a foreign market, the logical next step is to introduce their product into the US, which has one of the most lucrative healthcare markets in the world. Read more

Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices
25 June 2020
Evolving FDA Thinking on Advisory Committee Meetings Related to Foods, Drugs, and Devices

FDA advisory committee meetings are important regulatory events for many manufacturers on the path to marketing approval. These meetings can quite literally result in the approval or rejection of a product based on the panel’s vote. Read more

NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?
22 June 2020
NDA vs. OTC Monograph: Which Pathway is Right for You?

One of the main challenges our clients face is determining which regulatory pathway is best for their products. For example, what if an OTC product has a Monograph active ingredient but that ingredient is present at a different amount than the permitted amount? Or what if the label claims a novel indication not specified in a Monograph? If you are debating pursuit of either regulatory pathway for your OTC drug, it is critical to consider cost, timeline, and label claims to ensure your products has a unique stance in today’s market. Read more

4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus
19 June 2020
4 Problems Importing Rapid Antibody Tests for Coronavirus

US distributors and agents trying to import rapid antibody tests for coronavirus face a number of obstacles. The good news is that FDA has opened up the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program to include SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) and COVID-19 (the disease), expediting time to market. Read more

Let’s work together

The journey to scientific and commercial success is often complex and always critical, if you are looking for an expert partner to help steer you to confident solutions, contact us today

Contact us