The Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) met on November 13th to discuss the Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals.
The Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee (EMDAC) met on November 13th to discuss the Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc supplemental New Drug Application (sNDA) 204629/S-020 for empagliflozin. The sNDA seeks to expand the indicated use of empagliflozin, 10-25mg/day, for glycemic control / cardiovascular risk reduction in patients with type-II diabetes to include type-I diabetes as well as a lower dose of 2.5mg.
Type-II diabetes is a metabolic disease that develops when the body has reduced sensitivity to insulin, a natural hormone that signals for cells to reduce glucose (sugar) circulating in the blood. Type-I diabetes, in contrast is an inherited disorder where insulin sensitivity is lost due to autoimmune factors. When insulin sensitivity is lost the body can no longer regulate blood sugar, leading to toxic levels resulting in a variety of adverse effects, increased risk of adverse cardiovascular outcomes. The sNDA for this advisory committee includes evidence from the EASE trial which included patients taking insulin injections and compared empagliflozin versus placebo. The study showed a statistically significant reduction in HbA1c, a marker of blood sugar levels over time.
Empagliflozin (brand name Jardiance) is an oral medication that inhibits the sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) protein. SGLT2 is a protein in the kidneys, the organ that excretes any excessive blood molecules into the bladder. SGLT2 prevents sugar from being excreted unless an excessive blood level is reached. Inhibiting SGLT2 alleviates some of the excess blood sugar found in patients with diabetes. Because blood sugar is an energy source for cells, the body may begin to metabolize fat to make up for the lost energy in response to SGLT2 inhibition. Excessive fat metabolism can lead to a byproduct that can become toxic and cause a condition known as “diabetic ketoacidosis”.
This meeting was comprised of three discussion questions and one voting question. The voting question discussed expanding the indicated population of empagliflozin to include patients with type-I diabetes at a lower dose. The committee voted 2 (YES) to 14 (NO). The panelists who voted “YES” were persuaded by evidence from the EASE trial which demonstrated significant evidence for efficacy. The majority of panelists voted “NO” and expressed concern that the trial was not large enough to demonstrate that the benefits outweighed the risks. The primary concern was that diabetic ketoacidosis had been seen in previous trials with SGLT2 inhibitors at higher doses, and there was not enough evidence to adequately determine if the benefits outweighed the risks in the proposed lower dose.
The agency is not obligated to follow its panels’ recommendation, but normally does so. The sNDA is currently under FDA review.
ISS has almost two decades of experience in developing regulatory strategies including support for FDA Advisory Committee meetings. We are involved in more FDA AdComms per year than even the largest pharmaceutical companies. For more information on how ISS can help you prepare for your next meeting, contact email@example.com
Do you have an FDA Advisory Committee meeting, or another FDA meeting at the White Oak campus, scheduled?
Over the past few years, the number of ex-US manufacturers submitting a Class II exempt 510k device registration has increased substantially. For companies with medical devices that are approved and successful in a foreign market, the logical next step is to introduce their product into the US, which has one of the most lucrative healthcare markets in the world. Read more
FDA advisory committee meetings are important regulatory events for many manufacturers on the path to marketing approval. These meetings can quite literally result in the approval or rejection of a product based on the panel’s vote. Read more
One of the main challenges our clients face is determining which regulatory pathway is best for their products. For example, what if an OTC product has a Monograph active ingredient but that ingredient is present at a different amount than the permitted amount? Or what if the label claims a novel indication not specified in a Monograph? If you are debating pursuit of either regulatory pathway for your OTC drug, it is critical to consider cost, timeline, and label claims to ensure your products has a unique stance in today’s market. Read more
US distributors and agents trying to import rapid antibody tests for coronavirus face a number of obstacles. The good news is that FDA has opened up the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) program to include SARS-CoV-2 (the virus) and COVID-19 (the disease), expediting time to market. Read more
The journey to scientific and commercial success is often complex and always critical, if you are looking for an expert partner to help steer you to confident solutions, contact us todayContact us