The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has taken a critical stance on epidemiologic methods and systems for determining the value of study evidence.
The Institute of Medicine (IOM) has taken a critical stance on epidemiologic methods and systems for determining the value of study evidence. This recently published report highlights the methods and criteria used by various reputable scientific organizations (e.g., International Agency for Research on Cancer and the American Institute for Cancer Research) and how these organizations go about collecting, assessing and weighing evidence when making causal judgments.
A short commentary written by David Oliver (Partner at VORYS LLP) calls out two important ideas: (1) criteria should be explicit regarding the weight or relative importance, given to studies in humans, animals, or other experimental systems; and (2) strong and consistent epidemiological evidence in rigorously conducted studies is prima facie (self-evident from the facts) evidence.
These considerations regarding what is valid scientific evidence have significant implications in the context of litigation shrouded by complex science. As complex scientific issues and mechanisms enter the courtroom, legal professionals must maintain a high understanding of the intricacies of modern science as well as adequately determine whether expert testimony or causal evidence is based on rigorous scientific reasoning and methodology.
Did you like this post? We are here to help! Schedule a consult with one of our experts.
Just fill out the form bellow and we will contact you with more information.
On Wednesday July 8, 2020, Dr. David Schwartz of Innovative Science Solutions presented at the IADC 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting on a panel titled The Use of Genetic Testing in the Courtroom. A complimentary copy of the panel presentation is now available for download. Read more
Dr. David Schwartz of Innovative Science Solutions will be presenting at the IADC 2020 Virtual Annual Meeting on a panel titled The Use of Genetic Testing in the Courtroom. Read more
Plaintiff experts having been asserting for decades that all mesotheliomas must be linked to some asbestos exposure. Indeed, this has led to the erroneous (but widespread) view that mesothelioma is a signature disease, only caused by asbestos exposure. Read more
The journey to scientific and commercial success is often complex and always critical, if you are looking for an expert partner to help steer you to confident solutions, contact us todayContact us